Michael Zheng vs Daniil Glinka Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 03 Jul at 10:37 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Zheng vs D. Glinka

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

EST
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Zheng 1 - 0 Glinka
They have played 2 sets in total, with Michael Zheng winning 2 and Daniil Glinka winning 0. The last match between Michael Zheng and Daniil Glinka was at the Cary Challenger, 03-07-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Michael Zheng getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Zheng | 1 |
| Glinka | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Cary Challenger(07-03-25)
M. Zheng vs D. Glinka H2H Profile
M. Zheng vs D. Glinka Match Preview:
- Comparing recent second serve performance, Glinka has an edge, having won 46.25% of points, while Zheng has secured 41.87% under similar conditions.
- Looking at return game stats, Glinka wins 43.52% of points on opponent's second serves, significantly ahead of Zheng's 37.17%. However, Zheng narrowly leads on first serve returns, with 24.87% compared to Glinka's 23.96%.
- Examining how players manage breakpoints can be crucial. While Zheng marginally outperforms Glinka, saving 53.33% compared to Glinka's 52.52% of breakpoints saved.
- In their overall match win rate over the past year, Zheng has had a better performance, winning 72% of their matches, while Glinka has a win rate of 64.62%.
- On favored surfaces, Glinka excels on indoor hard courts with a 57% win rate, whereas Zheng performs best on hard courts with a 63% win ratio.
- An analysis of player level competition reveals Zheng has played against slightly higher-ranked opponents, averaging a rank of 396.68 compared to Glinka's average opponent rank of 419.29.
- If this match proceeds to a deciding set, Glinka's record is stronger, winning 59% of deciding sets, contrasting Zheng's 25% win rate in similar settings.
- For breakpoint conversion, Zheng is more efficient, converting 37.04% of opportunities versus Glinka's conversion rate of 28.42%.
Editorial Prediction (July 3, 2025, UTC):
Anticipation surrounds the upcoming match between Glinka and Zheng, two players with distinct strengths and weaknesses. On the second serve, Glinka’s effective play gives them a noticeable competitive advantage. Similarly, Glinka displays stronger performance in return games, especially against opponents' second serves, suggesting they might capitalize on Zheng's second serve weaknesses.
However, Zheng surpasses Glinka in terms of overall match win percentage in the past year and demonstrates superior breakpoint conversion abilities. When it comes to saving breakpoints, Zheng has a slight edge, which might be crucial in high-pressure moments.
Zheng also faces slightly higher-ranked opponents on average, which may indicate a more robust competitive experience. Despite this, Glinka has a notable advantage in deciding sets, winning them considerably more often than Zheng.
Considering these key statistics, and particularly Glinka's strengths in decisive moments, Glinka is marginally favored to claim victory in this encounter. Their advantage in second serve performance and deciding sets makes them the likely winner against Zheng.
Michael Zheng vs Daniil Glinka Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Zheng vs D. Glinka H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 8 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:38:25 | Average Match Time | 1:38:25 |
| 63% (50/79) | 1st Serve % | 57% (34/60) |
| 64% (32/50) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (21/34) |
| 52% (15/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (12/26) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Pts Won % | 14% (2/14) |
| 45% (27/60) | Return Points Win % | 41% (32/79) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Zheng Recent Matches Played
D. Glinka Recent Matches Played

M. Zheng vs D. Glinka Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65.09% (69/37) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.90% (232/183) |
| 62.76% (150/89) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.78% (531/421) |
| 54.57% (1224/1019) | Games Win/Loss | 52.62% (4856/4373) |
| 67.14% (47/23) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.66% (110/95) |
| 60.00% (12/8) | Clay Win/Loss | 47.27% (26/29) |
| 66.67% (10/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61.94% (96/59) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.43 |
| 360 | Aces Total | 1939 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 173 | Total Double Faults | 957 |
| 1:27:33 | Average Match Time | 1:23:5 |
| 412.74 | Average Opponent Rank | 424.79 |
| 58% (3503/6091) | 1st Serve % | 61% (14386/23659) |
| 72% (2530/3503) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (10304/14386) |
| 52% (1358/2588) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (4848/9273) |
| 43% (287/670) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (914/2214) |
| 41% (2644/6412) | Return Points Win % | 38% (9269/24092) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 100.00% (1/0) |
| 68.52% (37/17) | Challenger W/L | 53.68% (51/44) |
| 63.83% (30/17) | Futures W/L | 56.43% (180/139) |
| 65% (69/106) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (229/411) |
| 48% (11/23) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (63/134) |
| 56% (15/27) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (56/126) |
| 95% (65/62) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (247/202) |
| 5% (65/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (247/45) |
| 17% (41/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (168/29) |